@inbook {Emery 2011,
	title = {At the outer limits of authenticity: Denys the Carthusian{\textquoteright}s critique of Duns Scotus and his followers},
	booktitle = {Kent Emery Jr., Russell Friedman \& Andreas Speer (eds.), Philosophy and theology in the long Middle Ages},
	series = {Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters},
	number = {105},
	year = {2011},
	note = {<a href="http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/books/10.1163/ej.9789004169425.i-1006.109/">E-publicatie</a>.},
	pages = {641-672},
	address = {Leiden},
	abstract = {This chapter outlines the large structure of an interpretation, the historical architecture of thought, as it were, which determined Denys{\textquoteright} judgment of John Duns Scotus{\textquoteright} place and significance within the discursive formation; of medieval Scholastic thinking. Denys was probably the most prolific writer of the entire Middle Ages; sixteenth-century bibliographers estimated that he wrote four times as much as St. Augustine. Influenced more by Henry of Ghent than by Thomas Aquinas, Denys conceives Scholastic theology as a purely speculative and deductive science, the evidence for which is yielded by a divine illumination that lies between faith and vision, and is in continuity with the light of the blessed. The very structure of Denys{\textquoteright} threefold wisdom and its ultimate criterion of absolute divine simplicity suggest what kinds of serious problems he will discover in the teachings of John Duns Scotus.},
	keywords = {Duns Scotus Joannes},
	author = {Emery Jr., Kent}
}
